There are some who perceive Emma's recent comment as throwing shade at JK Rowling. If this was indeed intended as a slight, it certainly fits the criteria laid out by Kara Brown during her Shade Court tenure at Jezebel. Shade isn't direct insult; it often leaves room for interpretation, making people wonder about the intent behind the words. In Emma's case, some speculate that, as a member of the Harry Potter Universe, she might be addressing Rowling's persistent transphobia. However, true shade doesn't immediately reveal itself and never fully implicates the person throwing it. In this instance, Emma's message seems to be more about inclusion within the wizarding world, overshadowing any perceived shade.
I should note that I've previously harbored transphobic views, both personally and on this platform. I've made derogatory remarks and contributed to harming the transgender community. I continue to apologize for this and aim to learn from the feedback received. Emma's approach stands in stark contrast to Rowling's consistent othering of trans individuals. Emma's comment, whether shaded or not, emphasizes inclusion for all witches, which should be uncontroversial.
What's truly offensive, however, is the criticism directed at Emma by those who interpreted her comment as a slight against JK Rowling, suggesting she owes her success solely to Rowling. This idea that she's somehow ungrateful is unfounded. Emma is using her platform responsibly, advocating for inclusivity. Although she has been relatively quiet and hasn't been involved in projects since Little Women in 2018/19, her appearance at the BAFTAs might hint at a comeback.
Regarding her outfits, while the white flouncy skirt at the BAFTAs was nice, her attire for the after-party—a black suit, lace top, and combat boots—was preferred by some. It showcased a different style that resonated with many.
0 Comments